GamblingCompliance: New Jersey Tracks Eye Historical Racing As Revenue Boost


Horseracing in New Jersey has fallen on hard times, and to help boost revenues, purses and attendance at the state’s three racetracks, track executives and lobbyists believe historical racing is key to their survival.

Representatives from the racing industry recently appeared in Trenton before members of the New Jersey legislature calling on lawmakers to approve a measure to legalize the games.

“Based on models in other states, purses would be increased significantly so as to enable us to be more competitive with surrounding states, which have slot or casino revenue,” said Dennis Drazin, an advisor to the New Jersey Thoroughbred Horsemen’s Association.

“We do believe historical racing will increase attendance,” Drazin told GamblingCompliance in an email.

Historical racing, also known as instant racing, is a form of electronic gambling machine that allows players to bet on replays of horse races or dog races that have already run.

The machines are marketed and sold as a legal form of pari-mutuel wagering, with outcomes determined by pooled bets on previously run horse races.

“Customers bet on historical racing because it’s fast, simple and similar to slot machine play, but based on a pari-mutuel model,” Drazin said. “Fans are given past performance data, but can’t identify the race.”

Historical racing is already offered in Arkansas, Kentucky, Wyoming and Oregon with $1.1bn bet on the product in four states last year.

Idaho and Texas had approved historical racing, but then pulled the plug on the machines.

The Idaho legislature, for example, approved the machines in 2013 but then in 2015 lawmakers banned historical horseracing after concerns were raised the machines resembled illegal slot machines.

New Jersey Assemblyman Ralph Caputo, a Democrat and chairman of the Assembly Tourism, Gaming and the Arts Committee, said his committee was “very interested in learning about this new concept … that has been established in some other states and has been very, very profitable and also very successful.”

“The horseracing industry has deteriorated over the last number of years due to a lack of state support and also because of changing demographics,” Caputo said.

“Obviously, the state needs revenue, the horseracing industry needs revenue,” Caputo said. “So, we are very interested in any new concept that would help the racing industry, but also the general state of the economy of New Jersey.”

Chris McErlean, vice president at Penn National Gaming, owner of Freehold Raceway, agreed the New Jersey racing industry was struggling.

McErlean on Tuesday praised Caputo for holding a hearing on the issue, and was hopeful that historical racing gets some momentum in the legislature.

In 2011, Republican Governor Chris Christie ended a $30m annual subsidy for purses that Atlantic City casinos paid the racing industry to compensate them for a prohibition on slot machines.

The Assembly committee discussed historical racing at a June 1 hearing, but as of Tuesday had not scheduled a hearing to vote on Assembly Concurrent Resolution 196.

Senate Bill 2886 introduced in January also would permit historical racing in New Jersey.

As the results are based on actual pari-mutual races that took place in the past, supporters believe the format does not require voter approval.

Marshall Spevak, chief of staff for Assemblyman Vince Mazzeo, a Democrat who represents Atlantic City and is vice chairman of the Tourism, Gaming and the Arts Committee, said Tuesday that if historical racing is gambling then “there is a constitutional question.”

Under New Jersey’s constitution, new forms of gambling are prohibited unless they have been approved by state-wide referendum.

Spevak said his boss was “very protective of the casino business in Atlantic City.”

“That’s really the point, making sure we are not expanding gambling beyond Atlantic City,” said Spevak, adding that there needs to be “a lot more research and thought that goes into this.”

However, racing supporters insist historical racing machines simply give tracks a chance to sell their product in a new way.

Scott Wells, president and general manager of Remington Park and Lone Star Park, told attendees at last month’s Pan American Conference in Washington that historical racing was the next step in the evolution of pari-mutuel wagering.

“Not to allow racetracks to have historical racings … is a restriction of fair trade,” Wells said. “It keeps the industry in handcuffs.”

GamblingCompliance: New Jersey To Continue Sports-Betting Battle As NBA Favors Federal Solution


The U.S. Solicitor General’s Office may have dealt a knockout blow to New Jersey’s six-year battle to legalize sports betting, but the state’s top gaming regulator says efforts will continue.

“We are still on hold,” David Rebuck, director of New Jersey’s Division on Gaming Enforcement (DGE), said Wednesday. “Right now, the long legal history of this case, we continue to fight the good fight.”

The solicitor general last week recommended that the Supreme Court not hear New Jersey’s case challenging the scope of the 1992 Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (PASPA).

PASPA bans legal sports betting in all states expect Nevada, Delaware, Oregon and Montana.

In the court brief, solicitor general Jeffrey B. Hall wrote that the case did not deserve the attention of the Supreme Court, as New Jersey had not raised valid constitutional problems and other states had yet to pursue similar legislation.

Still, sports-betting advocates remain unbowed.

“Hope springs eternal,” Joe Asher, CEO of William Hill US, said Wednesday about the prospects of rolling back the federal sports-betting ban.

“I think it was expected the solicitor general would weigh in against the court taking the case.”

But Asher predicted that if the Supreme Court allows PASPA to stand, there will be other litigation to follow in other jurisdictions. He put the chances at just 20 percent that the Supreme Court would hear the case following the solicitor general’s opinion.

Both Rebuck and Asher participated in a panel discussion at the IAGA International Gaming Summit in New York City.

Asher described PASPA as a “really obsolete law,” which has “created a large black market for illegal sports betting.”

The American Gaming Association (AGA) has estimated illegal sports betting to be a $150bn business in the United States. Others have estimated the value to be around $400bn annually.

“Clearly there is activity that is widespread throughout the United States,” Asher said.

There seemed to be division among the IAGA panelists as to who should regulate sports betting if and when it expands beyond Nevada.

Dan Spillane, senior vice president and assistant general counsel with the National Basketball Association (NBA), said there was no division about whether sports gambling should be legalized; the only disagreement is how you get there — state or federal regulation?

“The NBA endorses a federal solution,” Spillane said.

That position appears to go against the AGA’s and Rebuck’s preferred solution of states being able to choose the terms upon which they want to regulate sports betting.

Rebuck said that he was not against some federal minimum standards, but he believed there should be a state-by-state model to oversee “this type of wager in the future.”

The NBA, National Hockey League (NHL), Major League Baseball (MLB) and the National Football League (NFL) have all softened their traditional opposition to gambling in the last few years.

The NHL approved the Vegas Golden Knights as its 31st franchise that will take to the ice in September. Meanwhile, NFL owners voted 31-1 in March to allow the Oakland Raiders to move to Las Vegas, and gambling was not even an issue.

Asher said the one owner who voted against the move was concerned about teams moving, and not about any issues dealing with gambling.

Spillane admitted that the NBA helped drive the passage of PASPA out of concern over the integrity of their games.

But its position on sports betting has evolved since then.

“We have a global business,” Spillane said. “That global perspective shows us how they do it.”

As New Jersey waits for a decision from the Supreme Court, advocates are known to be lining up a further test of PASPA’s scope via a move to repeal the state’s prohibitions on sports betting and effectively permit the activity without any system of regulation.

A bill is expected to be introduced in the New Jersey House and Senate if the Supreme Court, as expected, rejects the state’s plea for a hearing on its sports-betting appeal.

Asher said that it is a “possibility that could happen.”

But Rebuck told GamblingCompliance after the panel that it was too early to discuss the possibility of New Jersey repealing its prohibition on sports gambling.

He expects a decision on whether the Supreme Court will hear the case by the end of June.

If you look at the state of gaming in the United States, it has “increased massively” since 1992 when PASPA became law, Rebuck said.

“Forty-nine states have some sort of legalized gambling,” the regulator said. “It used to be 48 states … I now call Utah in the box of legalized gambling. They don’t know it but they authorized daily fantasy sports (DFS) play.”

Rebuck added that most regulators believe DFS is “sports betting and if it is not sports gambling then it’s very close.”

He said DFS has raised the issue of sports betting with the general population.

“We love fantasy sports in the state of New Jersey for that reason,” Rebuck said.

Rebuck’s comments also came about a week after New Jersey Congressman Frank Pallone published draft legislation to overturn PASPA and establish a federal regulatory scheme for sports betting overseen by the Federal Trade Commission.

The proposed bill, known as the Gaming Accountability and Modernization Enhancement (GAME) Act, would also clarify the legality of online poker and casinos.

“Only Congress could come up with the GAME Act,” Rebuck said. “Whether it becomes legislation … it’s in its very early stages. It’s a start.”

Spillane said the NBA was looking at Pallone’s bill, but had no comment on the potential of the GAME Act becoming law.

“I appreciate it as another step forward,” Spillane said.

GamblingCompliance: Racino Executive Urges Embrace Of Historical Racing


A veteran racetrack executive believes the next step in the evolution of pari-mutuel racing in the United States is to allow tracks to offer historical horseracing, also known as instant racing, which allows players to bet on replays of horse races.

“The fact is that in most jurisdictions we are not being allowed to sell our own product in the most modern and productive way,” Scott Wells, president and general manager of Remington Park and Lone Star Park said at the Pan American Conference.

Wells said a live horse race every 25 minutes is the traditional way to sell horseracing, but “many of us are stuck thinking that’s the only way.”

Wells said the industry’s product is not just the visual experience of watching the race.

“It’s the results of the race that are our core product,” Wells told several hundred trainers, racetrack executives, politicians and racing officials gathered inside a Grand Hyatt ballroom in Washington, D.C.

The Pan American Conference, which offered a number of panel discussions on the health of the horseracing industry, racetrack design and marketing, was held May 17-20.

“The results of the race are what determine the winners and losers … and the distribution of the mutuel pools and purses. And the results are filed away forever. It doesn’t have to be that way,” Wells said.

Wells cited Oaklawn Park’s success with historical racing at its track in Hot Springs, Arkansas, which first offered the games in 2000, as an example a new revenue stream for racetracks.

Churchill Downs is also considering adding historic racing machines at the Louisville, Kentucky, track.

Bill Carstanjen, CEO of Churchill Downs, said during a first-quarter conference call in April that the machines have already been put in place at racetracks Kentucky Downs, Ellis Park and the Red Mile.

“We are intrigued by the idea and continue to analyze it closely,” Carstanjen said.

Historical racing games play like slot machines but base payouts on a pari-mutuel formula with winning combinations determined by previously run horse races.

“Historical horseracing gives us the opportunity to sell our real product — the results of the race — repeatedly in a modern, fast paced way, which is what the marketplace demands,” Wells said.

For those skeptical that historical racing is legal, Wells said that “as long as it is done in a pari-mutuel way, it is clearly been approved in all gaming jurisdictions.”

“Not to allow racetracks to have historical racings … is a restriction of fair trade. It keeps the industry in handcuffs,” said Scott Wells of Remington and Lone Star racetracks.

Wells added that unlike video gaming terminals (VGTs), which have saturated some gaming markets, instant racing should only be done at racetracks. Allowing the product more widely would “add dramatically to purses and the viability of the breeding and racing industries.”

During his 45-minute presentation titled “The Racino Experience,” Wells admitted that running two racetracks can “get a little depressing,” especially with the declining numbers of on-track bettors.

Wells also showed a few Remington Park commercials that incorporated jockeys to promote the track’s casino. As well as two commercial racinos, Oklahoma is home to 124 tribal casinos on Native American lands.

“Off course there has been a proliferation of gambling choices for everyone,” Wells said. “Where for many years Las Vegas and Atlantic City were the only choices that allowed gambling … now that pie has been divided into a thousand pieces.”

Defined as a marriage between casino gambling and horseracing, West Virginia pioneered the racino concept in 1990 when MTR Gaming Group was allowed to introduce gaming machines to Mountaineer Race Track and Gaming Resort in Chester.

Today there are 55 racinos nationwide, according to data compiled by GamblingCompliance.

In Oklahoma, racinos were legalized when a state-wide ballot measure was passed 60 to 40 percent in the fall of 2004. Wells said Remington Park was on the verge of closing when the measure was approved by voters.

“The racino model was very beneficial to Remington Park and the Oklahoma horse racing industry,” Wells said. “Our purses rose by 400 percent … our handle is up 30 percent.”

But increasing attendance at the track is still a struggle.

In Wells’ experience, 25 percent of racing customers play in the casino before they leave; only 5 percent of casino players bet on racing.

Wells cited those numbers in saying opponents of racinos could justifiably argue that basing your business on slot machines will just keep eroding horseracing.

“That’s a difficult argument to dispute,” Wells said. “But let me say I’ve had the racino experience and the non-racino experience for the last four years as the manager of Lone Star Park.”

Based in Grand Prairie, Texas, Lone Star Park is owned by the Chickasaw Nation of Oklahoma. The tribe have also owned Remington Park, located near Oklahoma City, since 2009.

“Texas is surrounded by Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma and New Mexico, all of which have casinos to support racing at the racetracks,” Wells said. “That has been catastrophic for the Texas horseracing industry.”

Wells was also critical of a move last year to try and adopt historical horseracing in Texas.

Under pressure from the state’s political leaders, Texas racing commissioners voted in February to rescind regulations that would have permitted historical racing machines at tracks.

“Texas politicians had one hand [behind their backs] … taking donations from politicians in other states, especially from casino interests in other states,” Wells said. “Texas has been held to a standstill.”

Wells admitted that Lone Star Park was “not doing well,” but he praised the Chickasaw Nation for their willingness to invest millions of dollars in both tracks.

This year, Lone Star Park will host 50 days of racing between April and July. Remington Park hosts 119 days and is in the midst of an annual quarter horse meet that runs through June 3, with live thoroughbred racing between September and December.


GamblingCompliance: AML Compliance Lawyers Cautious After MoneyGram Deal


Anti-money laundering (AML) and gaming law experts believe a settlement of civil charges brought by the federal government against a former MoneyGram compliance executive may make it harder to find quality applicants for AML compliance roles in casinos and other financial institutions.

Thomas Haider served as MoneyGram International’s chief compliance officer from 2003 until 2008, supervising the company’s fraud and AML compliance departments.

Haider was accused of failing to ensure compliance with AML and Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) laws during his career with the money transfer company, and last week settled the claims by paying a $250,000 penalty.

“I think it may have a chilling effect on qualified people taking the job,” said Donna More, a partner at Fox Rothschild in Chicago, of the impact on the ability of casinos and other groups to recruit AML compliance officers.

“Perhaps going forward they should be included in the D&O (Directors & Officers) insurance.”

Sharon Levin, a partner at WilmerHale in New York, said the Haider case serves as a warning to compliance officers that they face an increased risk of personal liability.

“In Haider, a court for the first time held that the Bank Secrecy Act permits the Treasury Department to sue individuals for an institution’s AML compliance failures,” Levin told GamblingCompliance.

“By reaching a settlement, that decision cannot be challenged on appeal,” she said. “But the Haider decision is unlikely to be the last word on this question.”

Levin’s advice: “Compliance officers should understand what insurance coverage they have, specifically whether their legal fees will be covered.”

On top of the $250,000 fine, Haider agreed as part of the settlement with prosecutors in Manhattan to accept a three-year ban on acting as a compliance employee at any money transfer company.

The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) of the U.S. Department of Treasury, which announced the civil action against Haider on December 18, 2014, had originally sought a $1m fine.

Although the Haider case does not involve casinos, it comes amid a period of intense scrutiny of the gaming industry’s AML practices on the part of FinCEN.

Casinos, just like banks and money transmitters such as MoneyGram, are considered a form of financial institution subject to the reporting and other compliance requirements established by the BSA.

Jennifer Roberts, an adjunct professor at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas’ William S. Boyd School of Law, said the penalty against an “individual compliance officer is something that should certainly be noticed.”

“However, the Haider case involved numerous ‘willful’ violations and several significant lapses in compliance,” Roberts said.

As part of the settlement, Haider accepted responsibility for failing to terminate contracts with specific MoneyGram outlets after receiving information that indicated the outlets were complicit in consumer fraud schemes.

According to a 50-page complaint, Haider also accepted responsibility for structuring MoneyGram’s AML program so that fraud reports about outlets were not generally provided to analysts who were responsible for filing suspicious activity reports to the government.

In a statement emailed to GamblingCompliance by one of his attorneys, Ian Comisky of Fox Rothschild in Philadelphia, Haider defended his work at MoneyGram despite the settlement.

The settlement also resolves Haider’s “separate claims against the Treasury Department based upon illegal media leaks that occurred in 2014, which were intended to … damage Haider’s reputation,” the statement said.

As for the gaming industry, Roberts said that many companies already have robust compliance programs in place because there has always been a risk of disciplinary actions by state regulators for major compliance failures.

“Not to mention, [AML] compliance officers have had the opportunity to enhance programs because of more recent FinCEN enforcement against the gaming industry,” Roberts said. “In the Haider case, you are talking about violations that occurred almost ten years ago.”

Levin said that regulators have tried to hold individuals responsible for corporate wrongdoing.

“AML is no different,” Levin said. “Regulators are showing a sustained interest in holding AML compliance officers personally liable for the institution’s AML deficiencies. This trend is likely to continue.”

Recent FinCEN enforcement actions have targeted various gaming companies, including CG Technology, California’s Hawaii Gardens and Oaks Club card rooms, Caesars Entertainment and the Trump Taj Mahal in Atlantic City.

FinCEN has also fined and barred a casino executive in the Northern Mariana Islands, although the individual in question was responsible for marketing programs involving high-rollers and was not an AML compliance officer.

Under the BSA, casinos and card clubs are expected to report all transactions worth more than $10,000, in addition to any others that could appear to be suspicious.

Federal regulators also expect casinos and other financial entities to demonstrate a so-called “culture of compliance.”

Levin said effective AML starts at the top.

“An AML officer must have strong independent authority and the support of the institution’s leadership,” Levin said. “This settlement only reinforces the importance of the support of company executives.”

The American Gaming Association (AGA) in 2014 published the casino industry’s first set of best practices for AML compliance.

Elizabeth Cronan, senior director of gaming policy at the AGA, said that individual compliance officers play a critical role on a daily basis.

“Compliance officers are essential to the industry’s strong culture of compliance,” Cronan told GamblingCompliance in an email.

GamblingCompliance: Nevada’s Sandoval Lobbies Sessions Over Online Regulation


With a 2011 Department of Justice legal memo under review, Nevada Governor Brian Sandoval has assured U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions that online gaming is well regulated and that controls on underage gambling and geo-location are working effectively.

Sandoval spent several days last week in Washington, D.C. meeting with Sessions, U.S. Department of Energy Secretary Rick Perry and Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Scott Pruitt, while also having a working breakfast at the White House.

“We talked about internet gaming and I reminded [Sessions] that I’m a former chairman of the Nevada Gaming Commission and I have personally worked on and sponsored a bill that allowed for interstate poker,” Sandoval said.

The governor noted he has also negotiated an interstate compact with Delaware, a decision that has “worked extremely well.”

“I am not aware of any issues associated with underage gaming with regard to internet poker and [players having] access to those sites that don’t live within the borders of Nevada,” the two-term Republican governor said.

Sandoval also said he told Sessions that Nevada has been “better than anybody in the country, if not the world, when it comes to the regulation of gaming.”

The meeting between Sandoval and Sessions came amid rumors that the attorney general, a former U.S. Senator from Alabama, is mulling a move to overturn the 2011 U.S. Department of Justice legal opinion that allows states to regulate online casino, poker and lottery games.

At his Senate confirmation hearing in January, Sessions said he was not a fan of the memo finding that the 1961 Wire Act only applies to online sports betting.

Still, Anthony Cabot, a partner with law firm Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie in Las Vegas, said several problems exist with the notion that Sessions can simply change the 2011 opinion.

Cabot noted that the Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals already decided in a 2002 case involving Mastercard that the Wire Act only applies to sports.

“Therefore, the branch of government that has primary responsibility for interpreting the law already has done so consistent with the 2011 opinion.”

In addition, the 2011 opinion, besides being correct, is extremely well researched and reasoned, according to Cabot.

“It will be difficult to even conceive of how this attorney general will justify a reversal on a purely analytical basis,” Cabot said.

Any move will draw criticism due to the interest of Sheldon Adelson, the influential Republican Party donor and chairman of Las Vegas Sands, in the topic of online gambling.

“No matter how hard online casinos try to cover it up, bad actors from all over the world continue to hack internet games,” John Ashbrook, a spokesman for the Coalition to Stop Internet Gambling.

“And we’re hopeful that the Department of Justice will reverse the Obama-era overreach that exposed Americans to a dangerous set of online predators.”

The Coalition to Stop Internet Gambling, a group supported by Las Vegas Sands, continues to lobby lawmakers to ban online gambling.

Jeff Ifrah, founder of Ifrah Law in Washington, D.C., said Sessions has always been a “keen advocate for state’s rights” as a U.S. senator and predicted “he will continue to be that advocate as our attorney general.”

“Were the DOJ memo to be rewritten to suggest the federal Wire Act can be used to prosecute non-sports betting related activity, such as poker and casino gaming, or even online lottery games, our federal courts will be called upon for their analysis of that question,” Ifrah said.

“Previously, two federal courts of appeal have reasoned that the language of the Wire Act is narrow and applies only to sports-betting related activity.”

Sandoval had already pushed back against a potential move to ban online gambling in his capacity as vice-chairman of the National Governors’ Association (NGA).

The NGA sent Sessions a letter last month requesting he leave decisions over online gambling policy to the states, not the federal government.

“As you review this issue, we encourage you to take note of the current regulatory mechanisms put in place by the states to ensure that consumers and children are protected, and that licensees comply with strict standards of conduct,” Sandoval and NGA chairman Governor Terry McAuliffe, a Democrat from Virginia, wrote.

The letter also warned Sessions that a federal “ban drives this activity offshore to unregulated markets.”

Since 2011, only Nevada, New Jersey and Delaware have legalized online poker and casino games, with a handful of state lotteries moving online as well.

But other states, including Pennsylvania, are considering legislation, while gaming experts also warn of wider fallout from any move to alter the scope of the Wire Act.

“Although the reversal of the DOJ’s 2011 memo might have minimal impact on interactive (internet) gaming in Nevada because of the current restriction to poker, it could certainly have an impact on the ability to conduct intrastate sports wagering, server-based gaming, account wagering, and other emerging wagering technologies in the state,” said Jennifer Roberts, associate director of the UNLV International Center for Gaming Regulation.

“Clearly, a reversal would have a much greater impact on the revived growth in New Jersey’s gaming market, as well as those states offering online lottery products,” Roberts said.

In the short term, David Schwartz, director for the Center for Gaming Research at UNLV, said any reversal would have a small negative effect.

“Poker is about 1 percent of the total gaming win, and online is a fraction of that,” Schwartz said.

“Long term, though, there could be negative consequences for Las Vegas-based companies, as this would inhibit efforts to roll out a wider menu of online offerings in Nevada, eliminate revenue sources from states where it is already legal, and complicate efforts to legalize it in new states,” Schwartz said.

Besides online gaming, Sandoval also used his visit to the nation’s capital to reiterate his “absolute opposition” to a proposed nuclear waste repository at Yucca Mountain and urged Perry to explore an alternative to deal with the “nation’s nuclear waste problem.”

Sandoval and the American Gaming Association (AGA) are opposed to the Energy Department operating a storage facility some 90 miles north of Las Vegas. The area is one of the nation’s top tourist destinations, drawing 43m tourists annually and generating $59bn in revenue, according to the Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority.

Sandoval told reporters on Friday that he made it extremely clear to Perry that “whether we’re friends or not, we’re not friends on this, that I would do everything in my power to oppose the project.”

Sandoval also warned Perry, a former Texas governor, that Nevada would use “every legal opportunity at our disposal to attack the assigning of the Yucca Mountain as a high level nuclear repository in our state.”

GamblingCompliance: Massachusetts Considers Revoking Mandatory Licensing Of Directors


The Massachusetts Gaming Commission (MGC) on Thursday approved proposed changes to the state’s regulations governing electronic games, while also discussing a proposal to revoke mandatory licensure of outside directors of casino companies.

The five-member commission requested gaming industry comment on the state’s requirement for licensing of outside directors, with most of the responses asking for a reciprocity policy or a more basic background check.

“Recruiting outside directors is a constant challenge for licensed gaming companies,” Geoff Freeman, president and CEO of the American Gaming Association (AGA), said in a letter to the commission.

Freeman noted that outside directors with experience in finance, marketing and technology can contribute to a gaming licensee’s management and growth.

“Yet many potential outside directors have never been licensed in the casino industry,” Freeman said. “An intrusive personal background check and suitability investigation for a part-time responsibility frequently deters talented business leaders.”

Freeman wrote that outside directors who have already gone through the rigorous background investigation and licensing process in one state may be forced to do it all over again in another jurisdiction.

He called on commissioners to consider two proposals to streamline the process:

* Recognition of Reciprocity: If an outside director is licensed in another U.S. regulated gaming jurisdiction, the Massachusetts Gaming Commission would permit that individual to “waive in” without further background investigation.

* Basic Background Registration: In the absence of an existing license in another state gaming jurisdiction, the outside director would disclose basic employment and identification information through a straightforward registration process.

Freeman added that by following established approaches in New Jersey, Pennsylvania and Michigan, Massachusetts would have the discretion to require licensure depending on the individual’s role in the casino company.

Robert DeSalvio, president of Wynn Boston Harbor, also submitted a letter of support for revoking mandatory licensure of outside directors in Massachusetts.

In a letter to the MGC, Nicholas Casiello, an attorney with Fox Rothschild, who represents MGM Resorts International in Massachusetts, said his client has problems attracting “highly qualified candidates” because of licensing requirements.

MGM Resorts operates in eight states, including Nevada and New Jersey. The company’s $950m casino in downtown Springfield, Massachusetts, is scheduled to open next year.

So far, Penn National Gaming’s Plainridge Park Casino is the only gaming facility open in Massachusetts. Wynn Resorts will open the $2.4bn Wynn Boston Harbor in 2019.

“Any reduction in licensing requirements of any jurisdiction in which MGM operates would be welcome and helpful in MGM’s continuing endeavours to attract qualified board members,” Casiello wrote.

Casiello urged the MGC to follow the approach taken by the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board, “in which only directors of publically traded companies holding certain positions have to be licensed.”

According to Pennsylvania’s gaming statute, all directors in a “privately held company must qualify.”

Meanwhile, “for publicly traded companies, only those outside directors who serve on the audit committee or are the chairman of the board (must qualify). However, the gaming board, in its discretion, may determine that any director must qualify.”

Both Massachusetts gaming commissioner Enrique Zuniga and chairman Stephen Crosby expressed their support for Pennsylvania’s approach to licensing outside directors.

Zuniga said the the Pennsylvania approach was an “easy tool for us to implement.”

Crosby agreed, saying he would “definitely like to pursue this,” but wants to “think about it a little more.”

The gaming commission on Thursday also decided to begin the process of considering proposed changes to the state’s rules governing standards for gaming devices.

Todd Grossman, the MGC’s deputy counsel, said his department had received comment from Scientific Games on the proposed changes, and would also talk with Gaming Laboratories International (GLI).

Among the changes to the standards are demands the licensee develop and submit for approval a “preventative maintenance program for the care and upkeep” of any physical part of any slot machine on the gaming floor.

The proposed rules would also deny the use of credit cards, debit cards or government issued electronic benefits transfer cards to play slot machines or purchase “any form or gaming value.”

Skill-based games, meanwhile, would be accommodated if they comply with the most recent update to GLI’s independent technical standards.

Grossman told commissioners that there may be other changes, but he suggested setting up a public hearing on the proposed changes and new regulations. As of Friday, no public hearing had been scheduled.

GamblingCompliance: Maryland Lawmaker Promises To Reintroduce Problem Gambling Bill


A bill increasing fees on slots and table games in Maryland to pay for problem gambling programs was approved in the Assembly only to have the Senate pass an amended bill without the increases shortly before the legislature adjourned for the year.

Delegate Nick Mosby said the General Assembly passed his problem gambling bill 138-1, with two members absent, but House Bill 1227 was stripped of the fee increases “within the last couple of hours of the session.”

“I am really disappointed,” Mosby told GamblingCompliance.

“I will bring the bill back in January,” Mosby said. “This time I will work with my Senate colleagues to get it done.”

Maryland’s casino operators already make annual payments to the state’s Problem Gambling Fund based on the number of gaming machines and table games they operate.

HB 1227, also known as the Problem Gambling Funding and Treatment Act of 2017, would have increased the annual fee for each video lottery terminal (VLT) from $425 to $500, while the annual fee for table games would have increased from $500 to $700.

Mosby estimated HB 1227 would have added about $1m annually to the state’s Problem Gambling Fund.

“When it comes to problem gambling there is a huge need in Maryland,” Mosby, a Democrat from Baltimore, said.

Mosby estimated that 150,000 people in Maryland had some form of a gambling problem.

According to the most recent figures published by the University of Maryland’s School of Medicine’s Center of Excellence on Problem Gambling, 67 percent of callers to their helpline were male, while 33 percent were female.

An overwhelming majority — 72 percent — reported casino-based gambling as the primary problem. Of those seeking help, 27 percent cited slot machines and 73 percent reported other casino games as being most problematic.

Other problems included lottery games (8 percent), non casino card games (3 percent) and horseracing (3 percent).

States with legalized casino gaming adopt varying approaches when it comes to allocating moneys to address problem gambling.

Typically, states either allocate a portion of overall tax revenues or casino admission fees to problem gambling, or instead levy fixed amounts on casino operators.

In addition to state statutory requirements, the American Gaming Association (AGA) has issued a Code of Conduct for Responsible Gaming, which deals with employee assistance and training, alcohol service and casino gambling advertising and marketing, among other things.

In the past fiscal year, Maryland dedicated about $4m to problem gambling. That figure will increase next fiscal year with the opening in December of MGM National Harbor.

But the amount is still less than half of 1 percent of the casinos’ annual revenues.

Keith Whyte, executive director of the National Council on Problem Gambling, said funding on a state level should equal 1 percent of total gaming revenue — encompassing lottery, as well as casinos and other forms of gambling.

A comprehensive problem gambling program should provide treatment, prevention, research and education, Whyte said.

The Senate approved an amended version of HB 1227 45-0, with two members absent.

Although the proposed fee increases were removed from the final version, the final bill simply states the intent of lawmakers for the Problem Gambling Fund to primarily provide financial support for treatment and prevention programs, including in- and outpatient treatments and educational services.

Maryland’s 90-day legislative session ended shortly before midnight on April 10.

Mosby said his bill was all about being “proactive and responsible” when it comes to protecting Maryland’s residents.

He said the extra $1m was not enough, given the significant growth of casino gaming industry in the state.

A record revenue month for MGM National Harbor helped post the strongest month yet for all six of Maryland’s casinos, which brought in $141.2m in revenue in March, according to revenue figures released by Maryland Lottery and Gaming.

The new record beats the previous high of $133.5m, set in December when MGM debuted, the agency said.

“It has become a billion dollar industry in Maryland,” Mosby said.